Govt Enforces ‘Melt and Pour’ Rule for All Steel in Public Projects Nippon Steel expected to finalize U.S. Steel acquisition at $55 per share NMDC Limited reports a 38% drop in Q4 FY24 consolidated net profit RINL to Raise $23 Million Through Land Sales Amid Crisis
The Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs (CBIC) has advised its officers to recklessly avoid issuing show cause notices (SCNs) under GST, as it will lead to litigations. This instruction has come as the new due date for issuing SCNs related to FY19 approaches its end on January 31, 2024.
Last week, businessline reported that with the new due date approaching, businesses are bracing for a flurry of show-cause notices from GST officials for FY19 regarding any possible shortfall in tax payment. Similarly, the new due date for SCNs related to FY20 is June 30, 2024.
In a communication to taxmen, CBIC Chairman Sanjay Kumar Agrawal said, “It needs to be kept in mind by proper offices that the issuance of show cause notices should be done after due consideration of facts and circumstances of the case and after examining the relevant documents submitted by the taxpayers. Needless to say, recklessly issuing show cause notices will lead to unnecessary litigations in the future.”
Section 73 of the GST Act deals with the determination of tax not paid, short-paid, or erroneously refunded, or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilised for any reason other than fraud or any wilful misstatement or suppression of facts. Under this section, an officer shall issue the notice at least three months before the time limit specified for the issuance of an order. Earlier, the time limit for issuance of orders related to the recovery of tax not paid, short paid, or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilised for FY19 was March 31, 2024. However, on December 28, the Finance Ministry, through a notification, extended the timeline to April 30, 2024. This means the timeline for issuing SCNs also gets extended by one month, i.e., January 31, 2024. Similarly, for FY20, the due date for issuance of SCNs was extended by two months, and now it will be April 30.
“The Chief Commissioners of the Zones are advised to keep a close watch on the number of pending investigations, scrutiny, etc., to ensure that the officers under their supervision are working methodically,” Agrawal said. It may be noted that the extended deadlines mentioned above apply specifically to time-barring periods under Section 73. The GST department will still have an additional two years to issue notices and orders under suppression or misrepresentation cases under Section 74. Following a court ruling, it is expected that the department might give businesses 15-30 days to reply to ensure that taxpayers have a reasonable opportunity to be heard.
Industry sources say that many notices were issued just before the fiscal year 2017-18 due date. Various reports suggest that in December itself, GST authorities issued demand notices totalling ₹1.45-lakh crore to around 1,500 businesses for inconsistencies in annual returns and input tax credit claims for the financial year 2018. Now, the expectation is that with advice from the Chairman, the situation might not be as seen for the last fiscal.
Legacy cases
The Chairman also highlighted the issue of legacy adjudication. He emphasised that nearly 1 lakh legacy cases involving over ₹29,000 crore need to be adjudicated quickly as it has been more than six years since the rollout of GST. “With the promotion of 2,398 officers from Group’ B’ to Group ‘A’ level, there has been a substantial increase in manpower at the level of adjudicating officers. The increased strength should also translate into faster liquidation of pendency,” he advised.
According to Rajat Mohan, Executive Director of Moore Singhi, when tax officers rapidly issue notices to meet deadlines, such as the extended deadline for FY19 in January 2024, it risks compromising the quality and fairness of tax assessments. “This approach can lead to errors, unnecessary disputes, and undermine taxpayer rights. It highlights the need for more efficient processes, better tax administration, and policy changes to ensure accurate, fair tax collection,” he said.
Experts advise taxpayers to carefully review such notices and consult professionals if needed, while authorities should focus on balancing procedural efficiency with accuracy and fairness in their assessments. “In recent days, field officers’ eagerness to swiftly conclude tax cases and issue notices has seen a noticeable increase, frequently overlooking the basic principles of natural justice. Many of these officers are taking extreme measures, compelling taxpayers to settle tax payments on questionable grounds or facing the threat of having their cases escalated to the intelligence unit for alleged non-cooperation. This approach disregards the essential norms of procedural fairness and places undue pressure on taxpayers, coercing them into making unwarranted payments under the menace of increased scrutiny,” Mohan said.
Also Read : GST collections in January at ₹1.72 lakh crore, second-highest ever GST revenue collection hits record high of ₹2.10 lakh cr in April
The United States is urging Iraq to restart a vital oil pipeline to Turkey and crack down on Kurdish...
Oil & Gas 22-Feb-2025
Union Minister of Road Transport & Highways, Nitin Gadkari, sanctioned ₹1742.11 crore for the co...
Press Releases 13-Feb-2024
The European Commission announced on Thursday its approval of €6.9 billion ($7.4 billion) in st...
Europe 15-Feb-2024
NTPC's subsidiary NGEL signed an agreement with the Andhra Pradesh government to build an integrated...
Renewables 21-Feb-2024
India’s ambitious Mumbai-Ahmedabad Bullet Train project is set to achieve another major milest...
Business 01-Mar-2025
According to a new study by the Centre for Social and Economic Progress (CSEP), India will see a sub...
Raw Material 07-Jun-2024